The implications are extraordinary. This means that a marriage regime based on men’s overwhelming economic dominance may be passing into extinction if, in all sectors of society, women are on the ascent, and if gender parity is actually within reach. So long as ladies were rejected the educational and financial opportunities of males, it behooved them to “marry up”—how else would they enhance their lot? (As Maureen Dowd memorably place it inside her 2005 guide, Are Men Necessary?, “Females continue to be programmed to consider older males with resources, while men continue to be programmed to consider more youthful females with adoring gazes.”) Now that people can pursue our personal status and security, as they are therefore liberated from requiring guys just how we when did, we have been liberated to like them more, or at the least more idiosyncratically, which will be exactly how love should really be, is not it?
My pal B., who’s tall and gorgeous, jokes that she may have hitched an NBA player, but chose to opt for the guy she will speak with all night—a graphic musician who pops up to her neck. Continue reading