Neither is defendants’ conclusory statement when you look at the notice of treatment that the expense of injunctive relief would go beyond $75,000 enough.
See Honeycutt v. Dillard’s, Inc., 989 F. Supp. 1375, 1377 (D.Kan.1997). Defendants would not provide any underlying facts, numbers or calculations supporting this declaration. The undersigned has not yet considered this belated analysis that is”economic because it is maybe perhaps perhaps not within the elimination notice or submitted by means of *1201 connected affidavit thereto. 6 See Laughlin, 50 F.3d at 873; Martin, 251 F.3d at 1291 letter. 4; Coca-Cola Bottling of Emporia, Inc. v. Southern Beach Beverage Co., Inc., 198 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 1283 (D.Kan.2002) ( “Because jurisdiction is decided at the time of the notice of reduction, the movant must satisfy its burden when you look at the notice of reduction, maybe not in some later on pleading.”).
Even in the event defendants had submitted a suitable and affidavit that is timely the “economic analysis” of these expenses of injunctive relief Continue reading